Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or DBMF?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and DBMF returned +25.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, COWZ or DBMF?

COWZ charges 0.49% a year and DBMF charges 0.85%, so COWZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs DBMF: how they differ

COWZ and DBMF are both equity index funds, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +23.4%.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF.

COWZ and DBMF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Pacer	iMGP
What it is	US Cash Cows 100	iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy
Total return, 1 year	+23.4%	+25.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.9 pts	+7.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.49%	0.85%
Holdings	100	not filed

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or DBMF?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and DBMF returned +25.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or DBMF?: COWZ charges 0.49% a year and DBMF charges 0.85%, so COWZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against DBMF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against DBMF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-DBMF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources