Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs VGSH: how they differ

BWET is a commodity fund and VGSH a bond index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +1.8%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund.

BWET and VGSH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerBreakwaveVanguard
What it isTanker ShippingShort-Term Treasury
Total return, 1 year+5129.6%+1.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5112.1 pts−15.7 pts
Expense rationot published0.03%
Holdingsnot filed91

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

VGSH in plain words

VGSH is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or VGSH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and VGSH returned +1.8%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against VGSH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against VGSH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BWET-VGSH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources