Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs SHY: how they differ

BWET is a commodity fund and SHY a bond index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +1.7%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

BWET and SHY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerBreakwaveiShares
What it isTanker Shipping1-3 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year+5129.6%+1.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5112.1 pts−15.8 pts
Expense rationot published0.15%
Holdingsnot filed89

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

SHY in plain words

SHY is a bond fund tracking the 1-3 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or SHY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and SHY returned +1.7%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against SHY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against SHY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BWET-SHY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources