Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BNDX vs HYG: how they differ
BNDX and HYG are both bond index funds, and over the year HYG returned more, +2.9% against −0.7%.
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.
| BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund | HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | iShares |
| What it is | Total International Bond | US high yield bonds |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.7% | +2.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.2 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.49% |
| Holdings | 6707 | not filed |
BNDX in plain words
BNDX is a bond fund tracking the Total International Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.
HYG in plain words
HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or HYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.7% and HYG returned +2.9%, so HYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BNDX or HYG?
- BNDX charges 0.07% a year and HYG charges 0.49%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BNDX against HYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BNDX-HYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources