Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs BNDX: how they differ

ACWI and BNDX hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and BNDX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and BNDX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIBNDX
Heidelberg Materials AG0.03%0.01%
Pandora A/S0.01%0.01%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj0.02%0.01%
Airbus SE0.12%0.01%
Neste Oyj0.01%0.01%
Sampo Oyj0.03%0.01%
Svenska Handelsbanken AB0.02%0.01%
Deutsche Post AG0.06%0.00%
Swedbank AB0.03%0.00%
AXA SA0.09%0.00%
EQT AB0.01%0.00%
Fastighets AB Balder0.00%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in BNDX
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.18%
APPLE INC. 4.02%Bundesschatzanweisungen 0.14%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%Canadian Government Bond 0.13%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%Canadian Government Bond 0.10%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%Canadian Government Bond 0.10%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%Canadian Government Bond 0.09%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%Canadian Government Bond 0.08%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%Canadian Government Bond 0.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWI and BNDX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI ACWITotal International Bond
Total return, 1 year+19.1%−0.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−18.2 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.07%
Holdings23076707

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

BNDX in plain words

BNDX is a bond fund tracking the Total International Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or BNDX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and BNDX returned −0.7%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or BNDX?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and BNDX charges 0.07%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against BNDX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against BNDX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-BNDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources