Which returned more over the last year, BND or COWZ?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −0.7% and COWZ returned +23.4%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BND or COWZ?

BND charges 0.03% a year and COWZ charges 0.49%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BND vs COWZ: how they differ

BND is a bond index fund and COWZ an equity index fund, and over the year COWZ returned more, +23.4% against −0.7%.

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.

BND and COWZ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund	COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	Pacer
What it is	US aggregate bonds	US Cash Cows 100
Total return, 1 year	−0.7%	+23.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.2 pts	+5.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.49%
Holdings	not filed	100

BND in plain words

BND is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or COWZ?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −0.7% and COWZ returned +23.4%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BND or COWZ?: BND charges 0.03% a year and COWZ charges 0.49%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BND against COWZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against COWZ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BND-COWZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources