Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or BND?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and BND returned −0.7%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ACWI or BND?

ACWI charges 0.32% a year and BND charges 0.03%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs BND: how they differ

ACWI is an equity index fund and BND a bond index fund, and over the year ACWI returned more, +19.1% against −0.7%.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund.

ACWI and BND on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	MSCI ACWI	US aggregate bonds
Total return, 1 year	+19.1%	−0.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.6 pts	−18.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.03%
Holdings	2307	not filed

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

BND in plain words

BND is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or BND?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and BND returned −0.7%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or BND?: ACWI charges 0.32% a year and BND charges 0.03%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against BND, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against BND, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-BND Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources