Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BITO vs XLG: how they differ
BITO and XLG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLG returned more over the year.
ProShares Bitcoin ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BITO and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BITO | Only in XLG |
|---|---|
| ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF 100.00% | NVIDIA Corp. 13.10% |
| Apple Inc. 10.76% | |
| Microsoft Corp. 8.18% | |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 6.99% | |
| Alphabet Inc. 6.05% | |
| Broadcom Inc. 4.85% | |
| Alphabet Inc. 4.82% | |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. 3.61% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | ProShares | Invesco |
| What it is | Bitcoin | S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | −34.8% | +12.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −52.3 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.20% |
| Holdings | 1 | 51 |
BITO in plain words
BITO is a digital asset fund tracking the Bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −34.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. It sat 40.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLG in plain words
XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BITO or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and XLG returned +12.2%, so XLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BITO or XLG?
- BITO charges 0.95% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so XLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITO against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BITO-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources