Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AOR vs BITO: how they differ
AOR and BITO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and AOR returned more over the year.
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and ProShares Bitcoin ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and BITO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AOR | Only in BITO |
|---|---|
| iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07% | ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF 100.00% |
| iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09% | |
| iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02% | |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29% | |
| iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57% | |
| iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99% | |
| iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | ProShares |
| What it is | Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation | Bitcoin |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | −34.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | −52.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 7 | 1 |
AOR in plain words
AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
BITO in plain words
BITO is a digital asset fund tracking the Bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −34.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. It sat 40.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or BITO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and BITO returned −34.8%, so AOR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or BITO?
- AOR charges 0.15% a year and BITO charges 0.95%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against BITO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-BITO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources