Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AGG vs BITO: how they differ
AGG is a bond index fund and BITO a spot crypto ETP, and over the year AGG returned more, −0.7% against −34.8%.
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and ProShares Bitcoin ETF.
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | ProShares |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | Bitcoin |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.7% | −34.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.2 pts | −52.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | not filed | 1 |
AGG in plain words
AGG is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
BITO in plain words
BITO is a digital asset fund tracking the Bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −34.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. It sat 40.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or BITO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −0.7% and BITO returned −34.8%, so AGG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or BITO?
- AGG charges 0.03% a year and BITO charges 0.95%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against BITO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AGG-BITO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources