Which returned more over the last year, BITO or VCLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so VCLT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BITO or VCLT?

BITO charges 0.95% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BITO vs VCLT: how they differ

BITO and VCLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VCLT returned more over the year.

ProShares Bitcoin ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BITO and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BITO	Only in VCLT
ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF 100.00%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%
	CVS Health Corp 0.34%
	Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%
	Boeing Co/The 0.27%
	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
	Amazon.com Inc 0.26%
	Oracle Corp 0.24%
	AT&T Inc 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

BITO and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	ProShares	Vanguard
What it is	Bitcoin	Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	−34.8%	−4.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−52.3 pts	−22.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.95%	0.03%
Holdings	1	2775

BITO in plain words

BITO is a digital asset fund tracking the Bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −34.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. It sat 40.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BITO or VCLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so VCLT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BITO or VCLT?: BITO charges 0.95% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BITO against VCLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITO against VCLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BITO-VCLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources