Which returned more over the last year, BITO or SLV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and SLV returned +53.8%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BITO or SLV?

BITO charges 0.95% a year and SLV charges 0.50%, so SLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BITO vs SLV: how they differ

BITO is a spot crypto ETP and SLV a commodity fund, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against −34.8%.

ProShares Bitcoin ETF and iShares Silver Trust.

BITO and SLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF	SLV iShares Silver Trust
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	ProShares	iShares
What it is	Bitcoin	Silver
Total return, 1 year	−34.8%	+53.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−52.3 pts	+36.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.95%	0.50%
Holdings	1	not filed

BITO in plain words

BITO is a digital asset fund tracking the Bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −34.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. It sat 40.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

SLV in plain words

SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BITO or SLV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and SLV returned +53.8%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BITO or SLV?: BITO charges 0.95% a year and SLV charges 0.50%, so SLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BITO against SLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITO against SLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BITO-SLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources