Which returned more over the last year, BITO or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BITO or PULS?

BITO charges 0.95% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BITO vs PULS: how they differ

BITO and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PULS returned more over the year.

ProShares Bitcoin ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BITO and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BITO	Only in PULS
ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF 100.00%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

BITO and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	ProShares	PGIM
What it is	Bitcoin	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	−34.8%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−52.3 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.95%	0.15%
Holdings	1	553

BITO in plain words

BITO is a digital asset fund tracking the Bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −34.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. It sat 40.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BITO or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BITO or PULS?: BITO charges 0.95% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BITO against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITO against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BITO-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources