Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BITO vs CGGR: how they differ
BITO and CGGR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGGR returned more over the year.
ProShares Bitcoin ETF and Capital Group Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BITO and CGGR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BITO | Only in CGGR |
|---|---|
| ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF 100.00% | Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | |
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.16% | |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | |
| Alphabet Inc 3.06% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF | CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | ProShares | Capital |
| What it is | Bitcoin | Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | −34.8% | +7.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −52.3 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.39% |
| Holdings | 1 | 89 |
BITO in plain words
BITO is a digital asset fund tracking the Bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −34.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. It sat 40.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BITO or CGGR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BITO returned −34.8% and CGGR returned +7.2%, so CGGR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BITO or CGGR?
- BITO charges 0.95% a year and CGGR charges 0.39%, so CGGR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITO against CGGR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BITO-CGGR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources