Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BINC vs IWB: how they differ
BINC and IWB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BINC and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BINC | Only in IWB |
|---|---|
| UMBS, TBA 5.13% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.73% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.81% | APPLE INC. 6.03% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.14% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.00% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.10% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.33% |
| UMBS, TBA 1.52% | ALPHABET INC. 3.00% |
| iShares iBoxx USD High Yield Corporate B 1.02% | BROADCOM INC. 2.54% |
| iShares iBoxx USD Investment Grade Corpo 0.64% | ALPHABET INC. 2.42% |
| UMBS, TBA 0.53% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Flexible Income | Russell 1000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.0% | +16.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −15.5 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 2.4% | 91.9% |
| Holdings | 4124 | 1024 |
BINC in plain words
BINC is an index equity fund tracking the Flexible Income. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4124 positions, with the top ten at 17.4%.
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or IWB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +2.0% and IWB returned +16.7%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- How much do BINC and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 2% of BINC and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BINC against IWB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BINC-IWB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources