Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BIL vs BWET: how they differ

BIL is a short-term Treasury fund and BWET a commodity fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +3.7%.

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF.

BIL and BWET on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetBreakwave
What it is1-3 month T-billsTanker Shipping
Total return, 1 year+3.7%+5129.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−13.8 pts+5112.1 pts
Expense ratio0.14%not published

BIL in plain words

BIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BIL or BWET?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and BWET returned +5129.6%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BIL against BWET, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIL against BWET, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BIL-BWET Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources