Data as of .
IMF vs RSST: which moved less with stocks?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IMF moved less with the S&P 500 than RSST: correlation +0.22 against +0.87.
ETFIQ Diversifier Score: IMF scores higher
How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?
A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
One strategy, two funds
IMF and RSST both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, IMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.22 with the S&P 500 and RSST’s +0.87. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, IMF averaged +0.28% and RSST −1.32%. Over the same weeks, IMF finished 19.4 percentage points ahead of cash and RSST finished 32.3 points ahead of cash.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMF | RSST | IMF | RSST | |
| 3 months | +4.1% | +5.7% | +1.9 pts | +3.4 pts |
| 6 months | +7.7% | +23.9% | −10.4 pts | +5.9 pts |
| 1 year | +23.1% | +37.1% | +6.5 pts | +20.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +76.6% | not published | −1.8 pts |
| Since launch | +7.4% | +77.3% | −29.6 pts | −0.3 pts |
| IMF Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises | RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Invesco | Return Stacked |
| Strategy | Managed futures | Managed futures |
| Correlation with the S&P 500 | +0.22 | +0.87 |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.12 | +1.30 |
| Down-week capture | −22.7% | 106.4% |
| Average week when the S&P 500 fell | +0.28% | −1.32% |
| The S&P 500 in those weeks | −1.24% | −1.24% |
| Total return, same 52 weeks | +23.1% | +35.9% |
| Against T-bills, percentage points | +19.4 pts | +32.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.99% |
| Listed | Mar 19, 2025 | Sep 6, 2023 |
| Net assets | $319m | $415m |
IMF in plain words
IMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.22 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.12, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.12% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks IMF rose 0.28% on average, a down-week capture of −22.7%. Over the same 52 weeks IMF returned +23.1% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 19.4 percentage points ahead of cash.
RSST in plain words
RSST is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.87 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +1.30, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.30% the same way. In the same weeks RSST fell 1.32% on average, a down-week capture of 106.4%. Over the same 52 weeks RSST returned +35.9% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 32.3 percentage points ahead of cash.
Questions people ask
- Which moved less with the S&P 500, IMF or RSST?
- Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, IMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.22 with the S&P 500 and RSST’s +0.87, so IMF moved less with the index.
- Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, IMF or RSST?
- In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, IMF averaged +0.28% and RSST −1.32%, so IMF returned more in those weeks.
- Which earned more than cash, IMF or RSST?
- Over the same weeks, IMF finished 19.4 percentage points ahead of cash and RSST finished 32.3 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
- Which is cheaper, IMF or RSST?
- IMF charges 0.65% a year and RSST charges 0.99%, so IMF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IMF against RSST, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/imf-vs-rsst Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.