Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ASMF vs BTRN: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTRN moved less with the S&P 500 than ASMF: correlation +0.21 against +0.34.

Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF.

+0.34ASMF correlation with the S&P 500
+0.21BTRN correlation with the S&P 500
7.5%ASMF down-week capture
51.2%BTRN down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: ASMF scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

ASMF 65.5BTRN 53.14.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ASMFFell 8% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%ASMF−0.09%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%ASMF−0.09%Average week when SPY fell
BTRNFell 51% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%BTRN−0.64%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%BTRN−0.64%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

ASMF and BTRN both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, ASMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.34 with the S&P 500 and BTRN’s +0.21. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, ASMF averaged −0.09% and BTRN −0.64%. Over the same weeks, ASMF finished 12.9 percentage points ahead of cash and BTRN finished 15.8 points behind cash.

Performance, window by window

ASMF and BTRN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
ASMFBTRNASMFBTRN
3 months+3.1%+7.5%+0.9 pts+5.3 pts
6 months+6.5%−0.7%−11.5 pts−18.8 pts
1 year+16.9%−13.9%+0.3 pts−30.5 pts
Since launch+9.2%+7.3%−39.1 pts−42.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ASMF and BTRN on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ASMF
Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerVirtusGlobal X
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.34+0.21
Beta to the S&P 500+0.24+0.31
Down-week capture7.5%51.2%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.09%−0.64%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+16.6%−12.2%
Against T-bills, percentage points+12.9 pts−15.8 pts
Expense ratio0.80%0.95%
ListedMay 16, 2024Mar 21, 2024
Net assets$31m$2m

ASMF in plain words

ASMF is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.34 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.24, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.24% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks ASMF fell 0.09% on average, a down-week capture of 7.5%. Over the same 52 weeks ASMF returned +16.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 12.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

BTRN in plain words

BTRN is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.31, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.31% the same way. In the same weeks BTRN fell 0.64% on average, a down-week capture of 51.2%. Over the same 52 weeks BTRN returned −12.2% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, ASMF or BTRN?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, ASMF’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.34 with the S&P 500 and BTRN’s +0.21, so BTRN moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, ASMF or BTRN?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, ASMF averaged −0.09% and BTRN −0.64%, so ASMF returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, ASMF or BTRN?
Over the same weeks, ASMF finished 12.9 percentage points ahead of cash and BTRN finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, ASMF or BTRN?
ASMF charges 0.80% a year and BTRN charges 0.95%, so ASMF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ASMF against BTRN, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ASMF against BTRN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/asmf-vs-btrn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources