Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BTRN vs FFUT: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FFUT moved less with the S&P 500 than BTRN: correlation −0.04 against +0.21.

Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF.

+0.21BTRN correlation with the S&P 500
−0.04FFUT correlation with the S&P 500
51.2%BTRN down-week capture
−32.3%FFUT down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: FFUT scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

BTRN 53.1FFUT 90.54.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BTRNFell 51% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%BTRN−0.64%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%BTRN−0.64%Average week when SPY fell
FFUTRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%FFUT+0.40%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%FFUT+0.40%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

BTRN and FFUT both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, BTRN’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500 and FFUT’s −0.04. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, BTRN averaged −0.64% and FFUT +0.40%. Over the same weeks, BTRN finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash and FFUT finished 23.4 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

BTRN and FFUT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
BTRNFFUTBTRNFFUT
3 months+7.5%+10.7%+5.3 pts+8.4 pts
6 months−0.7%+13.8%−18.8 pts−4.3 pts
1 year−13.9%+26.7%−30.5 pts+10.2 pts
Since launch+7.3%+31.6%−42.9 pts+1.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BTRN and FFUT on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerGlobal XFidelity
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.21−0.04
Beta to the S&P 500+0.31−0.03
Down-week capture51.2%−32.3%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.64%+0.40%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks−12.2%+27.0%
Against T-bills, percentage points−15.8 pts+23.4 pts
Expense ratio0.95%0.80%
ListedMar 21, 2024Jun 5, 2025
Net assets$2m$352m

BTRN in plain words

BTRN is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.31, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.31% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks BTRN fell 0.64% on average, a down-week capture of 51.2%. Over the same 52 weeks BTRN returned −12.2% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash.

FFUT in plain words

FFUT is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.04 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.03, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.03% the other way. In the same weeks FFUT rose 0.40% on average, a down-week capture of −32.3%. Over the same 52 weeks FFUT returned +27.0% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 23.4 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, BTRN or FFUT?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, BTRN’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500 and FFUT’s −0.04, so FFUT moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, BTRN or FFUT?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, BTRN averaged −0.64% and FFUT +0.40%, so FFUT returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, BTRN or FFUT?
Over the same weeks, BTRN finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash and FFUT finished 23.4 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, BTRN or FFUT?
BTRN charges 0.95% a year and FFUT charges 0.80%, so FFUT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BTRN against FFUT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BTRN against FFUT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/btrn-vs-ffut Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources