Data as of .
PEXL vs SUPL: which is really different?
PEXL and SUPL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PEXL returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: SUPL scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PEXL and SUPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in PEXL | Only in SUPL |
|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc 5.75% | DHL AG 5.05% |
| Alphabet Inc 5.64% | UNION PACIFIC CORP 4.86% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.43% | CSX CORP 4.74% |
| Apple Inc 4.81% | NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP 4.74% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.56% | CANADIAN NATL RAILWAY CO 4.67% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 4.41% | CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY 4.59% |
| Netflix Inc 3.71% | AMADEUS IT GROUP SA 4.58% |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.21% | FEDEX CORP 4.34% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEXL | SUPL | PEXL | SUPL | PEXL | SUPL | |
| 3 months | −4.7% | +0.1% | −6.9 pts | −2.1 pts | −2.2 pts | +2.6 pts |
| 6 months | +22.1% | +9.6% | +4.1 pts | −8.4 pts | −2.1 pts | −14.6 pts |
| 1 year | +25.5% | +22.3% | +8.9 pts | +5.7 pts | +3.7 pts | +0.5 pts |
| 3 years | +71.4% | +31.4% | −7.0 pts | −47.0 pts | −26.7 pts | −66.7 pts |
| Since launch | +196.6% | +30.9% | −9.9 pts | −49.4 pts | −125.0 pts | −78.2 pts |
| PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF Holds 100 stocks in reshoring and manufacturing, 97% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF Holds 40 stocks in reshoring and manufacturing, 29% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Pacer | ProShares |
| Theme | Reshoring and manufacturing | Reshoring and manufacturing |
| In the S&P 500 | 97.3% | 28.6% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 68.8% | 99.2% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 63.4% | 8.1% |
| Holdings | 100 | 40 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 43.5% | 46.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.58% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.71% | 0.58% |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.5% | +22.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +8.9 pts | +5.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +3.7 pts | +0.5 pts |
| Below its high | −5.1% | −6.8% |
| Net assets | $46m | $2m |
PEXL in plain words
By weight, 97% of PEXL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 69%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 100 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +25.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 8.9 pts. It sits 5.1% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
SUPL in plain words
By weight, 29% of SUPL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 46% of the fund across 40 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.7 pts. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Jul 17, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do PEXL and SUPL hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, PEXL or SUPL?
- PEXL has 97% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SUPL has 29%, so SUPL differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, PEXL or SUPL?
- PEXL charges 0.49% a year and SUPL charges 0.58%, so PEXL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PEXL against SUPL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pexl-vs-supl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.