Data as of .
ANEW vs BULD: which is really different?
ANEW and BULD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BULD returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: BULD scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ANEW and BULD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ANEW | BULD |
|---|---|---|
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 0.22% | 8.29% |
| CAMTEK LTD | 0.11% | 0.32% |
| Only in ANEW | Only in BULD |
|---|---|
| DANAHER CORP 2.39% | ASML Holding NV 8.91% |
| DOORDASH INC - A 2.35% | Proto Labs Inc 8.59% |
| ABBVIE INC 2.33% | Lam Research Corp 8.44% |
| DEERE & CO 2.31% | Stratasys Ltd 5.79% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 2.23% | KLA Corp 5.53% |
| ABBOTT LABORATORIES 2.18% | Autodesk Inc 5.49% |
| SYMRISE AG 2.18% | 3D Systems Corp 4.82% |
| INTL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES 2.17% | Nano Dimension Ltd 3.80% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANEW | BULD | ANEW | BULD | ANEW | BULD | |
| 3 months | +6.5% | −7.2% | +4.2 pts | −9.5 pts | +8.9 pts | −4.8 pts |
| 6 months | +19.1% | +26.1% | +1.1 pts | +8.1 pts | −5.1 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 1 year | +3.9% | +37.2% | −12.7 pts | +20.6 pts | −17.9 pts | +15.4 pts |
| 3 years | +56.3% | +84.5% | −22.1 pts | +6.1 pts | −41.9 pts | −13.7 pts |
| Since launch | +40.4% | +75.7% | −97.4 pts | −19.8 pts | −118.3 pts | −60.9 pts |
| ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF Holds 146 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 51% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF Holds 55 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 36% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | Pacer |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 51.0% | 35.8% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 76.2% | 97.2% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 25.2% | 36.7% |
| Holdings | 146 | 55 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 22.4% | 62.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.49% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.9% | +37.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −12.7 pts | +20.6 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −17.9 pts | +15.4 pts |
| Below its high | −2.0% | −10.4% |
| Net assets | $8m | $14m |
ANEW in plain words
By weight, 51% of ANEW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 76%. The top ten holdings are 22% of the fund across 146 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 12.7 pts.
BULD in plain words
By weight, 36% of BULD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 55 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +37.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 20.6 pts. It sits 10.4% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do ANEW and BULD hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, ANEW or BULD?
- ANEW has 51% of its weight in S&P 500 names and BULD has 36%, so BULD differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, ANEW or BULD?
- ANEW charges 0.45% a year and BULD charges 0.49%, so ANEW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ANEW against BULD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/anew-vs-buld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.