Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
URA vs XT
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, URA and XT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in URA | Only in XT |
|---|---|
| CAMECO CORPORATION 23.14% | TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED 5.05% |
| Oklo Inc 7.31% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.02% |
| NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.27% | ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 4.00% |
| URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 5.79% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.62% |
| Joint stock company National atomic comp 4.81% | TESLA, INC. 3.52% |
| Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 4.33% | ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 3.41% |
| ENERGY FUELS INCORPORATED 4.24% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.18% |
| DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., L 4.07% | ALPHABET INC. 2.84% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URA | XT | URA | XT | URA | XT | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +3.1% | −3.0 pts | −1.6 pts | −0.4 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | −5.6% | +18.7% | −20.7 pts | +3.5 pts | −25.7 pts | −1.5 pts |
| 1 year | +19.6% | +31.3% | −0.4 pts | +11.3 pts | −6.0 pts | +5.7 pts |
| 3 years | +112.1% | +62.6% | +34.1 pts | −15.3 pts | +18.6 pts | −30.9 pts |
| Since launch | −30.8% | +285.1% | −760.5 pts | −59.8 pts | −1465.7 pts | −339.5 pts |
| URA Global X Uranium ETF | XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | iShares |
| Theme | Nuclear and uranium | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 65.9% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 66.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 42.9% |
| Holdings | 52 | 218 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 66.1% | 34.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.46% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +31.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −0.4 pts | +11.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −6.0 pts | +5.7 pts |
| Below its high | −47.6% | −1.8% |
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
XT in plain words
By weight, 66% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 67%. The top ten holdings are 35% of the fund across 218 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.3 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do URA and XT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, URA or XT?
- URA has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XT has 66%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, URA or XT?
- URA charges 0.69% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so XT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, URA against XT, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/URA-XT.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.