Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
COPX vs XT
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COPX and XT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COPX | Only in XT |
|---|---|
| Lundin Mining Corporation 6.07% | TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED 5.05% |
| GLENCORE PLC 6.00% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.02% |
| Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 5.98% | ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 4.00% |
| KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 5.82% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.62% |
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.06% | TESLA, INC. 3.52% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.95% | ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 3.41% |
| BHP GROUP LIMITED 4.92% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.18% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.87% | ALPHABET INC. 2.84% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | XT | COPX | XT | COPX | XT | |
| 3 months | +12.8% | +3.1% | +8.1 pts | −1.6 pts | +10.7 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | +13.8% | +18.7% | −1.4 pts | +3.5 pts | −6.4 pts | −1.5 pts |
| 1 year | +85.6% | +31.3% | +65.7 pts | +11.3 pts | +60.0 pts | +5.7 pts |
| 3 years | +153.8% | +62.6% | +75.8 pts | −15.3 pts | +60.3 pts | −30.9 pts |
| Since launch | +191.0% | +285.1% | −559.9 pts | −59.8 pts | −1371.8 pts | −339.5 pts |
| COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | iShares |
| Theme | Electrification and the grid | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 5.1% | 65.9% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 66.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 42.9% |
| Holdings | 39 | 218 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 53.4% | 34.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.46% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +85.6% | +31.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +65.7 pts | +11.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +60.0 pts | +5.7 pts |
| Below its high | −6.0% | −1.8% |
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +85.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 65.7 pts. It sits 6.0% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
XT in plain words
By weight, 66% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 67%. The top ten holdings are 35% of the fund across 218 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.3 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do COPX and XT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or XT?
- COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XT has 66%, so COPX differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, COPX or XT?
- COPX charges 0.65% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so XT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COPX against XT, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/COPX-XT.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.