Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
PAVE vs SMH
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PAVE and SMH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in PAVE | Only in SMH |
|---|---|
| QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 4.18% | NVIDIA Corp 17.56% |
| CSX Corporation 3.48% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 9.29% |
| EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 3.30% | Applied Materials Inc 5.74% |
| HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. 3.27% | Micron Technology Inc 5.68% |
| TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 3.19% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.63% |
| UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 3.12% | KLA Corp 5.58% |
| NUCOR CORPORATION 3.10% | Lam Research Corp 5.32% |
| ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. 2.92% | Broadcom Inc 5.28% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAVE | SMH | PAVE | SMH | PAVE | SMH | |
| 3 months | −2.5% | −0.5% | −7.2 pts | −5.2 pts | −4.6 pts | −2.5 pts |
| 6 months | +7.1% | +49.0% | −8.0 pts | +33.8 pts | −13.0 pts | +28.8 pts |
| 1 year | +19.3% | +96.2% | −0.7 pts | +76.3 pts | −6.3 pts | +70.6 pts |
| 3 years | +77.6% | +267.0% | −0.4 pts | +189.0 pts | −15.9 pts | +173.5 pts |
| Since launch | +297.3% | +5013.0% | +19.0 pts | +4201.6 pts | −189.6 pts | +3328.9 pts |
| PAVE Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF | SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | VanEck |
| Theme | Infrastructure | Semiconductors |
| In the S&P 500 | 62.1% | 82.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 97.2% | 80.6% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 6.2% | 85.9% |
| Holdings | 100 | 25 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 32.3% | 70.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.35% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.48% | 0.43% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.3% | +96.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −0.7 pts | +76.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −6.3 pts | +70.6 pts |
| Below its high | −7.9% | −15.2% |
PAVE in plain words
By weight, 62% of PAVE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 100 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. It sits 7.9% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
SMH in plain words
By weight, 82% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 70% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +96.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 76.3 pts. It sits 15.2% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do PAVE and SMH hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, PAVE or SMH?
- PAVE has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SMH has 82%, so PAVE differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, PAVE or SMH?
- PAVE charges 0.47% a year and SMH charges 0.35%, so SMH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PAVE against SMH, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/PAVE-SMH.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.