Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
BOTZ vs SMH
8% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and SMH hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | BOTZ | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 8.31% | 17.56% |
| Only in BOTZ | Only in SMH |
|---|---|
| KEYENCE CORPORATION 9.34% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 9.29% |
| ABB Ltd 9.07% | Applied Materials Inc 5.74% |
| FANUC CORPORATION 9.02% | Micron Technology Inc 5.68% |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 6.17% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.63% |
| Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd 4.34% | KLA Corp 5.58% |
| SMC CORPORATION 4.03% | Lam Research Corp 5.32% |
| DAIFUKU CO., LTD. 3.53% | Broadcom Inc 5.28% |
| RoboTechnik Intelligent Technology Co Lt 2.74% | Intel Corp 5.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTZ | SMH | BOTZ | SMH | BOTZ | SMH | |
| 3 months | −5.3% | −0.5% | −10.0 pts | −5.2 pts | −7.4 pts | −2.5 pts |
| 6 months | −0.3% | +49.0% | −15.5 pts | +33.8 pts | −20.5 pts | +28.8 pts |
| 1 year | +8.6% | +96.2% | −11.3 pts | +76.3 pts | −16.9 pts | +70.6 pts |
| 3 years | +36.4% | +267.0% | −41.5 pts | +189.0 pts | −57.0 pts | +173.5 pts |
| Since launch | +153.8% | +5013.0% | −170.6 pts | +4201.6 pts | −415.5 pts | +3328.9 pts |
| BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF | SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | VanEck |
| Theme | Robotics and automation | Semiconductors |
| In the S&P 500 | 18.7% | 82.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 88.1% | 80.6% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 18.7% | 85.9% |
| Holdings | 61 | 25 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 59.0% | 70.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.35% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.77% | 0.43% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.6% | +96.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −11.3 pts | +76.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −16.9 pts | +70.6 pts |
| Below its high | −13.6% | −15.2% |
BOTZ in plain words
By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. It sits 13.6% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.
SMH in plain words
By weight, 82% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 70% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +96.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 76.3 pts. It sits 15.2% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BOTZ and SMH hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or SMH?
- BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SMH has 82%, so BOTZ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, BOTZ or SMH?
- BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and SMH charges 0.35%, so SMH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOTZ against SMH, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/BOTZ-SMH.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.