ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

ARTY vs PAVE

iShares Future AI & Tech ETF and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ARTY and PAVE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ARTYOnly in PAVE
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.39%QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 4.18%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 5.24%CSX Corporation 3.48%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.84%EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 3.30%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.54%HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. 3.27%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.37%TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 3.19%
COREWEAVE, INC. 4.27%UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 3.12%
BROADCOM INC. 4.25%NUCOR CORPORATION 3.10%
SK hynix Inc. 3.63%ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. 2.92%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ARTY and PAVE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
ARTYPAVEARTYPAVEARTYPAVE
3 months+7.9%−2.5%+3.2 pts−7.2 pts+5.8 pts−4.6 pts
6 months+58.8%+7.1%+43.6 pts−8.0 pts+38.6 pts−13.0 pts
1 year+79.1%+19.3%+59.1 pts−0.7 pts+53.5 pts−6.3 pts
3 years+137.7%+77.6%+59.7 pts−0.4 pts+44.2 pts−15.9 pts
Since launch+243.1%+297.3%+21.8 pts+19.0 pts−99.4 pts−189.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ARTY and PAVE on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
PAVE
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
IssueriSharesGlobal X
ThemeArtificial intelligenceInfrastructure
In the S&P 50049.7%62.1%
Active share vs the S&P 50084.1%97.2%
In the Nasdaq-10036.5%6.2%
Holdings61100
Top ten, share of the fund42.9%32.3%
Expense rationot published0.47%
Fee for the differing partnot published0.48%
Total return, 1 year+79.1%+19.3%
vs the S&P 500+59.1 pts−0.7 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100+53.5 pts−6.3 pts
Below its high−5.6%−7.9%

ARTY in plain words

By weight, 50% of ARTY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 43% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +79.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 59.1 pts. It sits 5.6% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

PAVE in plain words

By weight, 62% of PAVE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 100 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. It sits 7.9% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ARTY and PAVE hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ARTY or PAVE?
ARTY has 50% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PAVE has 62%, so PAVE differs more from the index.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ARTY against PAVE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ARTY against PAVE, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ARTY-PAVE.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources