Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
NLR vs XT
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NLR and XT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in NLR | Only in XT |
|---|---|
| Cameco Corp 8.39% | TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED 5.05% |
| Constellation Energy Corp 8.03% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.02% |
| Public Service Enterprise Group Inc 7.08% | ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 4.00% |
| BWX Technologies Inc 6.77% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.62% |
| Fortum Oyj 5.74% | TESLA, INC. 3.52% |
| Oklo Inc 5.21% | ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 3.41% |
| Centrus Energy Corp 5.04% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.18% |
| Uranium Energy Corp 4.99% | ALPHABET INC. 2.84% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLR | XT | NLR | XT | NLR | XT | |
| 3 months | −1.8% | +3.1% | −6.5 pts | −1.6 pts | −3.9 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | −11.8% | +18.7% | −27.0 pts | +3.5 pts | −32.0 pts | −1.5 pts |
| 1 year | +4.0% | +31.3% | −16.0 pts | +11.3 pts | −21.6 pts | +5.7 pts |
| 3 years | +95.8% | +62.6% | +17.9 pts | −15.3 pts | +2.4 pts | −30.9 pts |
| Since launch | +200.2% | +285.1% | −611.2 pts | −59.8 pts | −1483.9 pts | −339.5 pts |
| NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VanEck | iShares |
| Theme | Nuclear and uranium | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 15.1% | 65.9% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.8% | 66.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 8.0% | 42.9% |
| Holdings | 25 | 218 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 61.0% | 34.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.46% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.52% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +31.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −16.0 pts | +11.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −21.6 pts | +5.7 pts |
| Below its high | −27.0% | −1.8% |
NLR in plain words
By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.0 pts. It sits 27.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
XT in plain words
By weight, 66% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 67%. The top ten holdings are 35% of the fund across 218 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.3 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do NLR and XT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, NLR or XT?
- NLR has 15% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XT has 66%, so NLR differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, NLR or XT?
- NLR charges 0.52% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so XT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NLR against XT, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/NLR-XT.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.