ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

BAI vs NLR

iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BAI and NLR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BAI and NLR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBAINLR
BWX Technologies Inc0.41%6.77%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BAIOnly in NLR
Broadcom Inc 5.97%Cameco Corp 8.39%
NVIDIA Corp 5.43%Constellation Energy Corp 8.03%
SK hynix Inc 4.93%Public Service Enterprise Group Inc 7.08%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 4.64%Fortum Oyj 5.74%
Alphabet Inc 4.26%Oklo Inc 5.21%
Tower Semiconductor Ltd 4.22%Centrus Energy Corp 5.04%
Lam Research Corp 3.99%Uranium Energy Corp 4.99%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.84%NexGen Energy Ltd 4.96%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BAI and NLR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
BAINLRBAINLRBAINLR
3 months−2.1%−1.8%−6.8 pts−6.5 pts−4.2 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+36.4%−11.8%+21.2 pts−27.0 pts+16.2 pts−32.0 pts
1 year+43.1%+4.0%+23.1 pts−16.0 pts+17.5 pts−21.6 pts
3 yearsn/a+95.8%n/a+17.9 ptsn/a+2.4 pts
Since launch+81.2%+200.2%+46.5 pts−611.2 pts+34.9 pts−1483.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BAI and NLR on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BAI
iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
IssueriSharesVanEck
ThemeArtificial intelligenceNuclear and uranium
In the S&P 50050.0%15.1%
Active share vs the S&P 50077.9%99.8%
In the Nasdaq-10043.9%8.0%
Holdings4525
Top ten, share of the fund43.8%61.0%
Expense rationot published0.52%
Fee for the differing partnot published0.52%
Total return, 1 year+43.1%+4.0%
vs the S&P 500+23.1 pts−16.0 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100+17.5 pts−21.6 pts
Below its high−17.8%−27.0%

BAI in plain words

By weight, 50% of BAI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 78%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 45 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +43.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 23.1 pts. It sits 17.8% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

NLR in plain words

By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.0 pts. It sits 27.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BAI and NLR hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BAI or NLR?
BAI has 50% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NLR has 15%, so NLR differs more from the index.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BAI against NLR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BAI against NLR, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/BAI-NLR.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources