Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
COPX vs NLR
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COPX and NLR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COPX | Only in NLR |
|---|---|
| Lundin Mining Corporation 6.07% | Cameco Corp 8.39% |
| GLENCORE PLC 6.00% | Constellation Energy Corp 8.03% |
| Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 5.98% | Public Service Enterprise Group Inc 7.08% |
| KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 5.82% | BWX Technologies Inc 6.77% |
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.06% | Fortum Oyj 5.74% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.95% | Oklo Inc 5.21% |
| BHP GROUP LIMITED 4.92% | Centrus Energy Corp 5.04% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.87% | Uranium Energy Corp 4.99% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | NLR | COPX | NLR | COPX | NLR | |
| 3 months | +12.8% | −1.8% | +8.1 pts | −6.5 pts | +10.7 pts | −3.9 pts |
| 6 months | +13.8% | −11.8% | −1.4 pts | −27.0 pts | −6.4 pts | −32.0 pts |
| 1 year | +85.6% | +4.0% | +65.7 pts | −16.0 pts | +60.0 pts | −21.6 pts |
| 3 years | +153.8% | +95.8% | +75.8 pts | +17.9 pts | +60.3 pts | +2.4 pts |
| Since launch | +191.0% | +200.2% | −559.9 pts | −611.2 pts | −1371.8 pts | −1483.9 pts |
| COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | VanEck |
| Theme | Electrification and the grid | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 5.1% | 15.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 99.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 8.0% |
| Holdings | 39 | 25 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 53.4% | 61.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.52% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.52% |
| Total return, 1 year | +85.6% | +4.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +65.7 pts | −16.0 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +60.0 pts | −21.6 pts |
| Below its high | −6.0% | −27.0% |
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +85.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 65.7 pts. It sits 6.0% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
NLR in plain words
By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.0 pts. It sits 27.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do COPX and NLR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or NLR?
- COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NLR has 15%, so COPX differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, COPX or NLR?
- COPX charges 0.65% a year and NLR charges 0.52%, so NLR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COPX against NLR, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/COPX-NLR.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.