Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
NLR vs TAN
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NLR and TAN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in NLR | Only in TAN |
|---|---|
| Cameco Corp 8.39% | First Solar, Inc. 11.74% |
| Constellation Energy Corp 8.03% | Nextpower Inc. 9.81% |
| Public Service Enterprise Group Inc 7.08% | Enphase Energy, Inc. 8.75% |
| BWX Technologies Inc 6.77% | Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. 7.58% |
| Fortum Oyj 5.74% | SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 6.32% |
| Oklo Inc 5.21% | Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources L 5.09% |
| Centrus Energy Corp 5.04% | Sunrun Inc. 4.83% |
| Uranium Energy Corp 4.99% | O.Y. Nofar Energy Ltd. 4.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLR | TAN | NLR | TAN | NLR | TAN | |
| 3 months | −1.8% | −25.0% | −6.5 pts | −29.7 pts | −3.9 pts | −27.1 pts |
| 6 months | −11.8% | −9.8% | −27.0 pts | −25.0 pts | −32.0 pts | −30.0 pts |
| 1 year | +4.0% | +14.3% | −16.0 pts | −5.6 pts | −21.6 pts | −11.3 pts |
| 3 years | +95.8% | −16.7% | +17.9 pts | −94.7 pts | +2.4 pts | −110.2 pts |
| Since launch | +200.2% | −38.6% | −611.2 pts | −850.0 pts | −1483.9 pts | −1722.7 pts |
| NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | TAN Invesco Solar ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VanEck | Invesco |
| Theme | Nuclear and uranium | Clean energy |
| In the S&P 500 | 15.1% | 11.7% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.8% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 8.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 25 | 31 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 61.0% | 65.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.70% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.52% | 0.70% |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +14.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −16.0 pts | −5.6 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −21.6 pts | −11.3 pts |
| Below its high | −27.0% | −60.4% |
NLR in plain words
By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.0 pts. It sits 27.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
TAN in plain words
By weight, 12% of TAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 31 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.6 pts. It sits 60.4% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do NLR and TAN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, NLR or TAN?
- NLR has 15% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TAN has 12%, so TAN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, NLR or TAN?
- NLR charges 0.52% a year and TAN charges 0.70%, so NLR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NLR against TAN, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/NLR-TAN.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.