Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
FDN vs TAN
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDN and TAN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDN | Only in TAN |
|---|---|
| Amazon.com, Inc. 9.84% | First Solar, Inc. 11.74% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 9.79% | Nextpower Inc. 9.81% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.22% | Enphase Energy, Inc. 8.75% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 6.19% | Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. 7.58% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 5.21% | SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 6.32% |
| Booking Holdings Inc. 4.91% | Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources L 5.09% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 4.78% | Sunrun Inc. 4.83% |
| Oracle Corporation 4.52% | O.Y. Nofar Energy Ltd. 4.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for May 31, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDN | TAN | FDN | TAN | FDN | TAN | |
| 3 months | +7.0% | −25.0% | +2.3 pts | −29.7 pts | +4.9 pts | −27.1 pts |
| 6 months | +18.1% | −9.8% | +2.9 pts | −25.0 pts | −2.1 pts | −30.0 pts |
| 1 year | +3.8% | +14.3% | −16.2 pts | −5.6 pts | −21.8 pts | −11.3 pts |
| 3 years | +69.7% | −16.7% | −8.3 pts | −94.7 pts | −23.8 pts | −110.2 pts |
| Since launch | +1039.1% | −38.6% | +227.8 pts | −850.0 pts | −644.9 pts | −1722.7 pts |
| FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | TAN Invesco Solar ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Invesco |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Clean energy |
| In the S&P 500 | 82.7% | 11.7% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 85.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 57.3% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 42 | 31 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.6% | 65.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.70% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.57% | 0.70% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% | +14.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −16.2 pts | −5.6 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −21.8 pts | −11.3 pts |
| Below its high | −1.5% | −60.4% |
FDN in plain words
By weight, 83% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 42 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.2 pts.
TAN in plain words
By weight, 12% of TAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 31 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.6 pts. It sits 60.4% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do FDN and TAN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDN or TAN?
- FDN has 83% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TAN has 12%, so TAN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FDN or TAN?
- FDN charges 0.49% a year and TAN charges 0.70%, so FDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDN against TAN, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/FDN-TAN.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.