Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
NASA vs URA
Tema Space Innovators ETF and Global X Uranium ETF, side by side on the themes desk.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | URA Global X Uranium ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Tema | Global X |
| Theme | Space | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 37 | 52 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.8% | 66.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.75% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | −6.6% (since launch on Mar 31, 2026) | +19.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −25.3 pts | −0.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −31.3 pts | −6.0 pts |
| Below its high | −43.9% | −47.6% |
NASA in plain words
By weight, 2% of NASA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 37 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −6.6% with distributions reinvested against +18.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 25.3 pts. It sits 43.9% below its all-time high of May 27, 2026.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do NASA and URA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, NASA or URA?
- NASA has 2% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so NASA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, NASA or URA?
- NASA charges 0.75% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so URA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NASA against URA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/NASA-URA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources