Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
CIBR vs URA
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF and Global X Uranium ETF, side by side on the themes desk.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | URA Global X Uranium ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Theme | Cybersecurity | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 61.9% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 90.7% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 47.9% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 43 | 52 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 56.9% | 66.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.64% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.4% | +19.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +11.5 pts | −0.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +5.9 pts | −6.0 pts |
| Below its high | −7.5% | −47.6% |
CIBR in plain words
By weight, 62% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.5 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do CIBR and URA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or URA?
- CIBR has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, CIBR or URA?
- CIBR charges 0.58% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so CIBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CIBR against URA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/CIBR-URA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources