Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
KWEB vs XT
1% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KWEB and XT hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KWEB | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings Limited | 10.47% | 0.46% |
| BAIDU, INC. | 4.20% | 0.04% |
| TAL EDUCATION GROUP | 2.99% | 0.01% |
| Only in KWEB | Only in XT |
|---|---|
| PDD Holdings Inc. 7.94% | TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED 5.05% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 7.72% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.02% |
| NETEASE, INC. 6.99% | ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 4.00% |
| MEITUAN 6.84% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.62% |
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd 4.17% | TESLA, INC. 3.52% |
| KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY 4.09% | ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 3.41% |
| KE Holdings Inc. 3.90% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.18% |
| JD.COM, INC. 3.88% | ALPHABET INC. 2.84% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | XT | KWEB | XT | KWEB | XT | |
| 3 months | −1.2% | +3.1% | −5.9 pts | −1.6 pts | −3.3 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | −12.3% | +18.7% | −27.5 pts | +3.5 pts | −32.5 pts | −1.5 pts |
| 1 year | −27.2% | +31.3% | −47.2 pts | +11.3 pts | −52.8 pts | +5.7 pts |
| 3 years | +0.5% | +62.6% | −77.4 pts | −15.3 pts | −93.0 pts | −30.9 pts |
| Since launch | +27.7% | +285.1% | −435.6 pts | −59.8 pts | −918.5 pts | −339.5 pts |
| KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | iShares |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 65.9% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 66.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 7.9% | 42.9% |
| Holdings | 33 | 218 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.2% | 34.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.46% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | −27.2% | +31.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −47.2 pts | +11.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −52.8 pts | +5.7 pts |
| Below its high | −69.8% | −1.8% |
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
XT in plain words
By weight, 66% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 67%. The top ten holdings are 35% of the fund across 218 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.3 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do KWEB and XT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or XT?
- KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XT has 66%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, KWEB or XT?
- KWEB charges 0.69% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so XT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against XT, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/KWEB-XT.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.