Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
AIQ vs KWEB
4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AIQ and KWEB hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AIQ | KWEB |
|---|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings Limited | 1.68% | 10.47% |
| MEITUAN | 0.38% | 6.84% |
| Only in AIQ | Only in KWEB |
|---|---|
| SK hynix Inc. 7.12% | PDD Holdings Inc. 7.94% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.77% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 7.72% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 4.81% | NETEASE, INC. 6.99% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4.80% | BAIDU, INC. 4.20% |
| INTEL CORPORATION 4.18% | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd 4.17% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 3.83% | KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY 4.09% |
| BROADCOM INC. 3.25% | KE Holdings Inc. 3.90% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 3.02% | JD.COM, INC. 3.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIQ | KWEB | AIQ | KWEB | AIQ | KWEB | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | −1.2% | −1.8 pts | −5.9 pts | +0.8 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 6 months | +31.0% | −12.3% | +15.8 pts | −27.5 pts | +10.8 pts | −32.5 pts |
| 1 year | +42.9% | −27.2% | +22.9 pts | −47.2 pts | +17.3 pts | −52.8 pts |
| 3 years | +124.2% | +0.5% | +46.3 pts | −77.4 pts | +30.8 pts | −93.0 pts |
| Since launch | +340.2% | +27.7% | +119.0 pts | −435.6 pts | −9.1 pts | −918.5 pts |
| AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | KraneShares |
| Theme | Artificial intelligence | Internet and e-commerce |
| In the S&P 500 | 64.8% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 70.2% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 55.9% | 7.9% |
| Holdings | 84 | 33 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 42.7% | 60.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.97% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +42.9% | −27.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +22.9 pts | −47.2 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +17.3 pts | −52.8 pts |
| Below its high | −8.3% | −69.8% |
AIQ in plain words
By weight, 65% of AIQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 70%. The top ten holdings are 43% of the fund across 84 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +42.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 22.9 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do AIQ and KWEB hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, AIQ or KWEB?
- AIQ has 65% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, AIQ or KWEB?
- AIQ charges 0.68% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so AIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIQ against KWEB, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/AIQ-KWEB.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.