Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
FDN vs KWEB
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDN and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDN | Only in KWEB |
|---|---|
| Amazon.com, Inc. 9.84% | Tencent Holdings Limited 10.47% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 9.79% | PDD Holdings Inc. 7.94% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.22% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 7.72% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 6.19% | NETEASE, INC. 6.99% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 5.21% | MEITUAN 6.84% |
| Booking Holdings Inc. 4.91% | BAIDU, INC. 4.20% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 4.78% | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd 4.17% |
| Oracle Corporation 4.52% | KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY 4.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDN | KWEB | FDN | KWEB | FDN | KWEB | |
| 3 months | +7.0% | −1.2% | +2.3 pts | −5.9 pts | +4.9 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 6 months | +18.1% | −12.3% | +2.9 pts | −27.5 pts | −2.1 pts | −32.5 pts |
| 1 year | +3.8% | −27.2% | −16.2 pts | −47.2 pts | −21.8 pts | −52.8 pts |
| 3 years | +69.7% | +0.5% | −8.3 pts | −77.4 pts | −23.8 pts | −93.0 pts |
| Since launch | +1039.1% | +27.7% | +227.8 pts | −435.6 pts | −644.9 pts | −918.5 pts |
| FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | KraneShares |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Internet and e-commerce |
| In the S&P 500 | 82.7% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 85.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 57.3% | 7.9% |
| Holdings | 42 | 33 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.6% | 60.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.57% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% | −27.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −16.2 pts | −47.2 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −21.8 pts | −52.8 pts |
| Below its high | −1.5% | −69.8% |
FDN in plain words
By weight, 83% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 42 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.2 pts.
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do FDN and KWEB hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDN or KWEB?
- FDN has 83% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FDN or KWEB?
- FDN charges 0.49% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so FDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDN against KWEB, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/FDN-KWEB.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.