Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
COPX vs KWEB
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COPX and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COPX | Only in KWEB |
|---|---|
| Lundin Mining Corporation 6.07% | Tencent Holdings Limited 10.47% |
| GLENCORE PLC 6.00% | PDD Holdings Inc. 7.94% |
| Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 5.98% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 7.72% |
| KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 5.82% | NETEASE, INC. 6.99% |
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.06% | MEITUAN 6.84% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.95% | BAIDU, INC. 4.20% |
| BHP GROUP LIMITED 4.92% | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd 4.17% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.87% | KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY 4.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | KWEB | COPX | KWEB | COPX | KWEB | |
| 3 months | +12.8% | −1.2% | +8.1 pts | −5.9 pts | +10.7 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 6 months | +13.8% | −12.3% | −1.4 pts | −27.5 pts | −6.4 pts | −32.5 pts |
| 1 year | +85.6% | −27.2% | +65.7 pts | −47.2 pts | +60.0 pts | −52.8 pts |
| 3 years | +153.8% | +0.5% | +75.8 pts | −77.4 pts | +60.3 pts | −93.0 pts |
| Since launch | +191.0% | +27.7% | −559.9 pts | −435.6 pts | −1371.8 pts | −918.5 pts |
| COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | KraneShares |
| Theme | Electrification and the grid | Internet and e-commerce |
| In the S&P 500 | 5.1% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 7.9% |
| Holdings | 39 | 33 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 53.4% | 60.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +85.6% | −27.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +65.7 pts | −47.2 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +60.0 pts | −52.8 pts |
| Below its high | −6.0% | −69.8% |
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +85.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 65.7 pts. It sits 6.0% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do COPX and KWEB hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or KWEB?
- COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, COPX or KWEB?
- COPX charges 0.65% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so COPX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COPX against KWEB, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/COPX-KWEB.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.