Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
KWEB vs TAN
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KWEB and TAN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KWEB | Only in TAN |
|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings Limited 10.47% | First Solar, Inc. 11.74% |
| PDD Holdings Inc. 7.94% | Nextpower Inc. 9.81% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 7.72% | Enphase Energy, Inc. 8.75% |
| NETEASE, INC. 6.99% | Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. 7.58% |
| MEITUAN 6.84% | SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 6.32% |
| BAIDU, INC. 4.20% | Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources L 5.09% |
| Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd 4.17% | Sunrun Inc. 4.83% |
| KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY 4.09% | O.Y. Nofar Energy Ltd. 4.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | TAN | KWEB | TAN | KWEB | TAN | |
| 3 months | −1.2% | −25.0% | −5.9 pts | −29.7 pts | −3.3 pts | −27.1 pts |
| 6 months | −12.3% | −9.8% | −27.5 pts | −25.0 pts | −32.5 pts | −30.0 pts |
| 1 year | −27.2% | +14.3% | −47.2 pts | −5.6 pts | −52.8 pts | −11.3 pts |
| 3 years | +0.5% | −16.7% | −77.4 pts | −94.7 pts | −93.0 pts | −110.2 pts |
| Since launch | +27.7% | −38.6% | −435.6 pts | −850.0 pts | −918.5 pts | −1722.7 pts |
| KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | TAN Invesco Solar ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | Invesco |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Clean energy |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 11.7% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 7.9% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 33 | 31 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.2% | 65.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.70% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.70% |
| Total return, 1 year | −27.2% | +14.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −47.2 pts | −5.6 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −52.8 pts | −11.3 pts |
| Below its high | −69.8% | −60.4% |
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
TAN in plain words
By weight, 12% of TAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 31 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.6 pts. It sits 60.4% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do KWEB and TAN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or TAN?
- KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TAN has 12%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, KWEB or TAN?
- KWEB charges 0.69% a year and TAN charges 0.70%, so KWEB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against TAN, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/KWEB-TAN.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.