ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

KWEB vs SOXX

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF and iShares Semiconductor ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KWEB and SOXX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in KWEBOnly in SOXX
Tencent Holdings Limited 10.47%Micron Technology, Inc. 8.55%
PDD Holdings Inc. 7.94%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 8.10%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 7.72%NVIDIA Corp. 6.82%
NETEASE, INC. 6.99%Intel Corp. 6.34%
MEITUAN 6.84%Broadcom, Inc. 6.08%
BAIDU, INC. 4.20%Applied Materials, Inc. 5.78%
Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd 4.17%KLA Corp. 5.65%
KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY 4.09%Marvell Technology, Inc. 5.23%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

KWEB and SOXX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
KWEBSOXXKWEBSOXXKWEBSOXX
3 months−1.2%−3.6%−5.9 pts−8.3 pts−3.3 pts−5.7 pts
6 months−12.3%+60.9%−27.5 pts+45.7 pts−32.5 pts+40.7 pts
1 year−27.2%+113.9%−47.2 pts+93.9 pts−52.8 pts+88.3 pts
3 years+0.5%+210.8%−77.4 pts+132.9 pts−93.0 pts+117.4 pts
Since launch+27.7%+3635.3%−435.6 pts+2823.9 pts−918.5 pts+1951.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
KWEB and SOXX on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
IssuerKraneSharesiShares
ThemeInternet and e-commerceSemiconductors
In the S&P 5000.0%80.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500100.0%81.6%
In the Nasdaq-1007.9%78.4%
Holdings3330
Top ten, share of the fund60.2%61.7%
Expense ratio0.69%not published
Fee for the differing part0.69%not published
Total return, 1 year−27.2%+113.9%
vs the S&P 500−47.2 pts+93.9 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−52.8 pts+88.3 pts
Below its high−69.8%−20.6%

KWEB in plain words

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

SOXX in plain words

By weight, 81% of SOXX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +113.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 93.9 pts. It sits 20.6% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do KWEB and SOXX hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or SOXX?
KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SOXX has 81%, so KWEB differs more from the index.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KWEB against SOXX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against SOXX, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/KWEB-SOXX.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources