ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

ITA vs KWEB

iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITA and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITAOnly in KWEB
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 22.63%Tencent Holdings Limited 10.47%
RTX CORPORATION 14.83%PDD Holdings Inc. 7.94%
THE BOEING COMPANY 8.90%Alibaba Group Holding Limited 7.72%
TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED 4.59%NETEASE, INC. 6.99%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. 4.50%MEITUAN 6.84%
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION 4.34%BAIDU, INC. 4.20%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION 4.05%Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd 4.17%
Northrop Grumman Corporation 3.92%KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY 4.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ITA and KWEB over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
ITAKWEBITAKWEBITAKWEB
3 months−1.6%−1.2%−6.3 pts−5.9 pts−3.7 pts−3.3 pts
6 months−6.7%−12.3%−21.9 pts−27.5 pts−26.9 pts−32.5 pts
1 year+14.2%−27.2%−5.7 pts−47.2 pts−11.4 pts−52.8 pts
3 years+100.8%+0.5%+22.9 pts−77.4 pts+7.4 pts−93.0 pts
Since launch+937.0%+27.7%+125.7 pts−435.6 pts−747.0 pts−918.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ITA and KWEB on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
IssueriSharesKraneShares
ThemeDefenseInternet and e-commerce
In the S&P 50076.6%0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 50097.9%100.0%
In the Nasdaq-1003.2%7.9%
Holdings4933
Top ten, share of the fund75.2%60.2%
Expense rationot published0.69%
Fee for the differing partnot published0.69%
Total return, 1 year+14.2%−27.2%
vs the S&P 500−5.7 pts−47.2 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−11.4 pts−52.8 pts
Below its high−10.9%−69.8%

ITA in plain words

By weight, 77% of ITA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 49 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +14.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. It sits 10.9% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.

KWEB in plain words

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do ITA and KWEB hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ITA or KWEB?
ITA has 77% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITA against KWEB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITA against KWEB, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ITA-KWEB.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources