Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
IGV vs KWEB
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IGV and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IGV | Only in KWEB |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 10.38% | Tencent Holdings Limited 10.47% |
| Microsoft Corp. 8.08% | PDD Holdings Inc. 7.94% |
| Palantir Technologies, Inc. 7.71% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 7.72% |
| Crowdstrike Holdings, Inc. 7.29% | NETEASE, INC. 6.99% |
| Oracle Corp. 6.26% | MEITUAN 6.84% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 4.81% | BAIDU, INC. 4.20% |
| AppLovin Corp. 4.76% | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd 4.17% |
| Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 3.92% | KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY 4.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGV | KWEB | IGV | KWEB | IGV | KWEB | |
| 3 months | +9.1% | −1.2% | +4.4 pts | −5.9 pts | +7.0 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 6 months | +18.9% | −12.3% | +3.7 pts | −27.5 pts | −1.3 pts | −32.5 pts |
| 1 year | −2.1% | −27.2% | −22.1 pts | −47.2 pts | −27.7 pts | −52.8 pts |
| 3 years | +43.9% | +0.5% | −34.1 pts | −77.4 pts | −49.6 pts | −93.0 pts |
| Since launch | +1031.5% | +27.7% | +220.2 pts | −435.6 pts | −652.5 pts | −918.5 pts |
| IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | KraneShares |
| Theme | Cloud and software | Internet and e-commerce |
| In the S&P 500 | 83.2% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 92.4% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 66.9% | 7.9% |
| Holdings | 107 | 33 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.7% | 60.2% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | not published | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | −2.1% | −27.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −22.1 pts | −47.2 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −27.7 pts | −52.8 pts |
| Below its high | −11.2% | −69.8% |
IGV in plain words
By weight, 83% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 107 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.1 pts. It sits 11.2% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2025.
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do IGV and KWEB hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, IGV or KWEB?
- IGV has 83% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGV against KWEB, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/IGV-KWEB.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.