Data as of .
FDN vs GDXJ: which is really different?
FDN and GDXJ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and GDXJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GDXJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 349 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDN and GDXJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDN | Only in GDXJ |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 10.43% | Evolution Mining Ltd 6.38% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 9.78% | Equinox Gold Corp 6.28% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.25% | Alamos Gold Inc 6.23% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 5.91% | Endeavour Mining PLC 5.33% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 5.18% | Coeur Mining Inc 5.15% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 4.79% | Industrias Penoles SAB de CV 2.89% |
| Booking Holdings Inc. 4.51% | First Majestic Silver Corp 2.72% |
| Oracle Corporation 4.44% | Hecla Mining Co 2.63% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDN | GDXJ | FDN | GDXJ | FDN | GDXJ | |
| 3 months | +9.3% | +20.3% | +6.0 pts | +17.0 pts | +10.1 pts | +21.1 pts |
| 6 months | +20.3% | +1.2% | +4.3 pts | −14.8 pts | −0.4 pts | −19.5 pts |
| 1 year | +1.9% | +42.4% | −15.6 pts | +24.9 pts | −21.0 pts | +19.4 pts |
| 3 years | +69.5% | +284.5% | −8.4 pts | +206.6 pts | −25.6 pts | +189.4 pts |
| Since launch | +1031.5% | +65.3% | +227.1 pts | −739.1 pts | −642.4 pts | −1608.6 pts |
| FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund Holds 42 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 82% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF Holds 110 stocks in miners and metals, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | VanEck |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Miners and metals |
| In the S&P 500 | 82.4% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 85.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 57.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 42 | 110 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.5% | 42.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.52% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.57% | 0.52% |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.9% | +42.4% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −15.6 pts | +24.9 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −21.0 pts | +19.4 pts |
| Below its high | −2.1% | −19.7% |
FDN in plain words
By weight, 82% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 42 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +1.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 15.6 pts.
GDXJ in plain words
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 110 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +42.4% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 24.9 pts. It sits 19.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FDN and GDXJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDN or GDXJ?
- FDN has 82% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GDXJ has 0%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FDN or GDXJ?
- FDN charges 0.49% a year and GDXJ charges 0.52%, so FDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDN against GDXJ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/FDN-GDXJ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.