Data as of .
BAI vs GDXJ: which is really different?
BAI and GDXJ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and GDXJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GDXJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 349 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BAI and GDXJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BAI | Only in GDXJ |
|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY 6.48% | Evolution Mining Ltd 6.38% |
| NVIDIA 5.32% | Equinox Gold Corp 6.28% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.77% | Alamos Gold Inc 6.23% |
| BROADCOM INC 4.75% | Endeavour Mining PLC 5.33% |
| TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.69% | Coeur Mining Inc 5.15% |
| LAM RESEARCH 4.06% | Industrias Penoles SAB de CV 2.89% |
| SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 3.01% | First Majestic Silver Corp 2.72% |
| SNOWFLAKE 3.00% | Hecla Mining Co 2.63% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAI | GDXJ | BAI | GDXJ | BAI | GDXJ | |
| 3 months | −9.1% | +20.3% | −12.3 pts | +17.0 pts | −8.3 pts | +21.1 pts |
| 6 months | +34.1% | +1.2% | +18.1 pts | −14.8 pts | +13.4 pts | −19.5 pts |
| 1 year | +32.3% | +42.4% | +14.8 pts | +24.9 pts | +9.3 pts | +19.4 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +284.5% | not published | +206.6 pts | not published | +189.4 pts |
| Since launch | +80.9% | +65.3% | +47.2 pts | −739.1 pts | +35.4 pts | −1608.6 pts |
| BAI iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF Holds 52 stocks in artificial intelligence, 55% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF Holds 110 stocks in miners and metals, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | VanEck |
| Theme | Artificial intelligence | Miners and metals |
| In the S&P 500 | 54.8% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 76.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 49.5% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 52 | 110 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 41.8% | 42.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.52% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.72% | 0.52% |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.3% | +42.4% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +14.8 pts | +24.9 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +9.3 pts | +19.4 pts |
| Below its high | −17.9% | −19.7% |
BAI in plain words
By weight, 55% of BAI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 76%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 52 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 14.8 pts. It sits 17.9% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
GDXJ in plain words
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 110 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +42.4% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 24.9 pts. It sits 19.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BAI and GDXJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, BAI or GDXJ?
- BAI has 55% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GDXJ has 0%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, BAI or GDXJ?
- BAI charges 0.55% a year and GDXJ charges 0.52%, so GDXJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BAI against GDXJ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/BAI-GDXJ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.