Data as of .
DRAM vs GDX: which is really different?
DRAM and GDX hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GDX scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 349 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRAM | GDX | DRAM | GDX | DRAM | GDX | |
| 3 months | −9.1% | +21.3% | −12.4 pts | +18.0 pts | −8.3 pts | +22.1 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +4.1% | not published | −11.9 pts | not published | −16.6 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +40.2% | not published | +22.7 pts | not published | +17.2 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +249.2% | not published | +171.3 pts | not published | +154.1 pts |
| Since launch | +112.9% | +137.2% | +96.1 pts | −667.2 pts | +90.6 pts | −1536.8 pts |
| DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF Holds 13 stocks in memory and storage, 20% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF Holds 59 stocks in miners and metals, 11% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | VanEck |
| Theme | Memory and storage | Miners and metals |
| In the S&P 500 | 20.0% | 11.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 96.8% | 99.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 13 | 59 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 97.3% | 58.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.51% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.67% | 0.51% |
| Total return, 1 year | +112.9% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026) | +40.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +96.1 pts | +22.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +90.6 pts | +17.2 pts |
| Below its high | −26.8% | −16.2% |
DRAM in plain words
By weight, 20% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 97% of the fund across 13 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +112.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 96.1 pts. It sits 26.8% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
GDX in plain words
By weight, 11% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 22.7 pts. It sits 16.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do DRAM and GDX hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or GDX?
- DRAM has 20% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GDX has 11%, so GDX differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, DRAM or GDX?
- DRAM charges 0.65% a year and GDX charges 0.51%, so GDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DRAM against GDX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/DRAM-GDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.