Data as of .
AIQ vs DRAM: which is really different?
AIQ and DRAM hold 10% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: DRAM scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 349 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
10% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIQ | DRAM | AIQ | DRAM | AIQ | DRAM | |
| 3 months | 0.0% | −9.1% | −3.3 pts | −12.4 pts | +0.8 pts | −8.3 pts |
| 6 months | +32.3% | not published | +16.3 pts | not published | +11.6 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +35.7% | not published | +18.2 pts | not published | +12.7 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +127.6% | not published | +49.7 pts | not published | +32.5 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +337.9% | +112.9% | +119.2 pts | +96.1 pts | −8.8 pts | +90.6 pts |
| AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF Holds 89 stocks in artificial intelligence, 56% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF Holds 13 stocks in memory and storage, 20% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Roundhill |
| Theme | Artificial intelligence | Memory and storage |
| In the S&P 500 | 55.9% | 20.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 69.7% | 96.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 47.5% | 20.0% |
| Holdings | 89 | 13 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 32.2% | 97.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.65% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.98% | 0.67% |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +112.9% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026) |
| vs the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | +96.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +12.7 pts | +90.6 pts |
| Below its high | −8.8% | −26.8% |
AIQ in plain words
By weight, 56% of AIQ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 70%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 89 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 18.2 pts. It sits 8.8% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
DRAM in plain words
By weight, 20% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 97% of the fund across 13 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +112.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 96.1 pts. It sits 26.8% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do AIQ and DRAM hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, AIQ or DRAM?
- AIQ has 56% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRAM has 20%, so DRAM differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, AIQ or DRAM?
- AIQ charges 0.68% a year and DRAM charges 0.65%, so DRAM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIQ against DRAM, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/AIQ-DRAM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.