Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TESC vs TSLT: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, TESC finished 2.4 points from its stated multiple and TSLT 2.8.

Corgi TSLA 2x Daily ETF and T-REX 2X LONG TESLA DAILY TARGET ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−31.6%TESC returned, 3 months
−28.3%TSLT returned, 3 months
−5.4 ptsTESC from its stated multiple
−8.1 ptsTSLT from its stated multiple
TESC2.4 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA +11.6% ×2 implies+23.2%TESC returned+20.7%TSLA +11.6% ×2 implies+23.2%TESC returned+20.7%
TSLT8.1 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLT returned−28.3%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLT returned−28.3%

Performance, window by window

TESC and TSLT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TESCTSLTTESCTSLTTESCTSLT
1 month+20.7%+20.4%+23.2%+23.2%−2.4 pts−2.8 pts
3 monthsnot published−28.3%not published−20.2%not published−8.1 pts
6 monthsnot published−29.3%not published−13.2%not published−16.1 pts
1 yearnot published−32.7%not published−1.8%not published−30.9 pts
Since launch−31.6%−33.9%−26.2%+132.1%−5.4 pts−166.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TESC and TSLT on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TESC
Corgi TSLA 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLT
T-REX 2X LONG TESLA DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
IssuerCorgiT-REX
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnTSLATSLA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+20.7%−28.3%
Underlying returned, 3 months+11.6%−10.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+23.2%−20.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−2.4 pts−8.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−31.6%−32.7%
Difference from stated, over that window−5.4 pts−30.9 pts
Underlying volatility50%56%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.4 pts−2.8 pts
Expense ratio0.45%1.05%
LaunchedJun 30, 2026Oct 19, 2023

TESC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: TESC returned +20.7% where its own daily promise gave +22.0%, 1.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's 11.6% implies +23.2%, which makes TESC look 2.4 points short. 1.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TESC aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 50% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLT in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLT returned −28.3% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLT look 8.1 points short. 5.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLT aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. TSLA moved at 56% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TESC or TSLT?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TESC finished 2.4 points from what its multiple implies and TSLT finished 8.1 points from its own, so TESC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TESC and TSLT levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TESC at +2 times and TSLT at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TESC or TSLT?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TESC’s moved at 50% annualized and TSLT’s at 56%, so TSLT has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TESC or TSLT for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TESC or TSLT?
TESC charges 0.45% a year and TSLT charges 1.05%, so TESC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TESC against TSLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TESC against TSLT, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TESC-TSLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources