Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TBT vs TMV: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TBT finished 2.7 points over and TMV 4.3 points over.

ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bear 3X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+11.9%TBT returned, 3 months
+18.0%TMV returned, 3 months
+2.6 ptsTBT from its stated multiple
+4.1 ptsTMV from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: TMV scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TBT 83.1TMV 97.50.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TBT2.6 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TLT −4.6% ×2 implies+9.2%TBT returned+11.9%TLT −4.6% ×2 implies+9.2%TBT returned+11.9%
TMV4.1 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TLT −4.6% ×3 implies+13.9%TMV returned+18.0%TLT −4.6% ×3 implies+13.9%TMV returned+18.0%

Performance, window by window

TBT and TMV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TBTTMVTBTTMVTBTTMV
1 month+2.9%+4.2%+2.3%+3.4%+0.6 pts+0.8 pts
3 months+11.9%+18.0%+9.2%+13.9%+2.6 pts+4.1 pts
6 months+13.1%+19.9%+8.7%+13.1%+4.3 pts+6.8 pts
1 year+22.4%+34.9%+12.7%+19.1%+9.6 pts+15.8 pts
3 years+27.4%+33.7%+5.1%+7.7%+22.2 pts+26.0 pts
Since launch−76.4%−93.9%−94.3%−141.5%+17.9 pts+47.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TBT and TMV on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TBT
ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of 20-year Treasuries (TLT)
TMV
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bear 3X ETF
Aims to return three times the opposite of the daily move of 20-year Treasuries (TLT)
IssuerProSharesDirexion
Sets out to return-2x-3x
OnTLTTLT
Segmentbondbond
Fund returned, 3 months+11.9%+18.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months−4.6%−4.6%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+9.2%+13.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months+2.6 pts+4.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+22.4%+34.9%
Difference from stated, over that window+9.6 pts+15.8 pts
Underlying volatility9%9%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.93%0.97%
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Jan 4, 2010

TBT in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TBT returned +11.9% where its own daily promise gave +9.2%, 2.7 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times TLT's −4.6% implies +9.2%, which makes TBT look 2.6 points over. 0.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TBT aims to return -2 times TLT's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TLT moved at 9% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TMV in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TMV returned +18.0% where its own daily promise gave +13.7%, 4.3 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times TLT's −4.6% implies +13.9%, which makes TMV look 4.1 points over. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TMV aims to return -3 times TLT's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TBT or TMV?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TBT finished 2.6 points from what its multiple implies and TMV finished 4.1 points from its own, so TBT came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TBT and TMV levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on 20-year Treasuries, TBT at -2 times and TMV at -3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TBT or TMV?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TBT’s moved at 9% annualized and TMV’s at 9%, so TBT has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TBT or TMV for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TBT or TMV?
TBT charges 0.93% a year and TMV charges 0.97%, so TBT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TBT against TMV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TBT against TMV, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TBT-TMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources