Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

REK vs SRS: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, REK finished 2.2 points over and SRS 3.5 points over.

ProShares Short Real Estate and ProShares UltraShort Real Estate, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+4.8%REK returned, 3 months
+8.1%SRS returned, 3 months
+1.8 ptsREK from its stated multiple
+2.1 ptsSRS from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: SRS scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

REK 71.5SRS 92.10.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

REK1.8 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IYR −3.0% ×1 implies+3.0%REK returned+4.8%IYR −3.0% ×1 implies+3.0%REK returned+4.8%
SRS2.1 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IYR −3.0% ×2 implies+6.0%SRS returned+8.1%IYR −3.0% ×2 implies+6.0%SRS returned+8.1%

Performance, window by window

REK and SRS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
REKSRSREKSRSREKSRS
1 month+2.9%+5.6%+2.7%+5.3%+0.2 pts+0.3 pts
3 months+4.8%+8.1%+3.0%+6.0%+1.8 pts+2.1 pts
6 months−2.2%−6.7%−4.1%−8.3%+2.0 pts+1.5 pts
1 year−0.7%−6.1%−4.7%−9.5%+4.0 pts+3.3 pts
3 years−11.5%−34.6%−29.0%−58.1%+17.6 pts+23.4 pts
Since launch−80.7%−98.6%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
REK and SRS on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
REK
ProShares Short Real Estate
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of ISHARES U.S. REAL ESTATE ETF (IYR)
SRS
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of ISHARES U.S. REAL ESTATE ETF (IYR)
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return-1x-2x
OnIYRIYR
Segmentsectorsector
Fund returned, 3 months+4.8%+8.1%
Underlying returned, 3 months−3.0%−3.0%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+3.0%+6.0%
Difference from stated, 3 months+1.8 pts+2.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−0.7%−6.1%
Difference from stated, over that window+4.0 pts+3.3 pts
Underlying volatility14%14%
Expense rationot published0.95%
LaunchedMar 18, 2010Jan 4, 2010

REK in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: REK returned +4.8% where its own daily promise gave +2.5%, 2.2 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times IYR's −3.0% implies +3.0%, which makes REK look 1.8 points over. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. REK aims to return -1 times IYR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IYR moved at 14% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SRS in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SRS returned +8.1% where its own daily promise gave +4.6%, 3.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times IYR's −3.0% implies +6.0%, which makes SRS look 2.1 points over. 1.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SRS aims to return -2 times IYR's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, REK or SRS?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, REK finished 1.8 points from what its multiple implies and SRS finished 2.1 points from its own, so REK came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are REK and SRS levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on ISHARES U.S. REAL ESTATE ETF, REK at -1 times and SRS at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, REK or SRS?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window REK’s moved at 14% annualized and SRS’s at 14%, so REK has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold REK or SRS for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

REK against SRS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, REK against SRS, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/REK-SRS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources