Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DRN vs REK: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, DRN finished 3.4 points short and REK 2.2 points over.

Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF and ProShares Short Real Estate, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−13.5%DRN returned, 3 months
+4.8%REK returned, 3 months
−4.6 ptsDRN from its stated multiple
+1.8 ptsREK from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: REK scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

DRN 31.6REK 71.50.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DRN4.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IYR −3.0% ×3 implies−9.0%DRN returned−13.5%IYR −3.0% ×3 implies−9.0%DRN returned−13.5%
REK1.8 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IYR −3.0% ×1 implies+3.0%REK returned+4.8%IYR −3.0% ×1 implies+3.0%REK returned+4.8%

Performance, window by window

DRN and REK over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
DRNREKDRNREKDRNREK
1 month−8.4%+2.9%−8.0%+2.7%−0.4 pts+0.2 pts
3 months−13.5%+4.8%−9.0%+3.0%−4.6 pts+1.8 pts
6 months+4.3%−2.2%+12.4%−4.1%−8.1 pts+2.0 pts
1 year+0.3%−0.7%+14.2%−4.7%−13.9 pts+4.0 pts
3 years+23.9%−11.5%+87.1%−29.0%−63.2 pts+17.6 pts
Since launch+210.4%−80.7%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DRN and REK on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF
Aims to return three times the daily move of ISHARES U.S. REAL ESTATE ETF (IYR)
REK
ProShares Short Real Estate
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of ISHARES U.S. REAL ESTATE ETF (IYR)
IssuerDirexionProShares
Sets out to return+3x-1x
OnIYRIYR
Segmentsectorsector
Fund returned, 3 months−13.5%+4.8%
Underlying returned, 3 months−3.0%−3.0%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−9.0%+3.0%
Difference from stated, 3 months−4.6 pts+1.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+0.3%−0.7%
Difference from stated, over that window−13.9 pts+4.0 pts
Underlying volatility14%14%
Expense ratio0.98%not published
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Mar 18, 2010

DRN in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: DRN returned −13.5% where its own daily promise gave −10.1%, 3.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +3 times IYR's −3.0% implies −9.0%, which makes DRN look 4.6 points short. 1.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DRN aims to return +3 times IYR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IYR moved at 14% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

REK in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: REK returned +4.8% where its own daily promise gave +2.5%, 2.2 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times IYR's −3.0% implies +3.0%, which makes REK look 1.8 points over. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. REK aims to return -1 times IYR's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, DRN or REK?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, DRN finished 4.6 points from what its multiple implies and REK finished 1.8 points from its own, so REK came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are DRN and REK levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on ISHARES U.S. REAL ESTATE ETF, DRN at +3 times and REK at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, DRN or REK?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window DRN’s moved at 14% annualized and REK’s at 14%, so DRN has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold DRN or REK for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DRN against REK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DRN against REK, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/DRN-REK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources