Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NVDL vs NVDX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, NVDL finished 2.2 points from its stated multiple and NVDX 2.4.

GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF and T-REX 2X LONG NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+6.2%NVDL returned, 3 months
+5.2%NVDX returned, 3 months
−6.8 ptsNVDL from its stated multiple
−7.8 ptsNVDX from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: NVDL scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

NVDL 40.3NVDX 23.30.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

NVDL6.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies+13.0%NVDL returned+6.2%NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies+13.0%NVDL returned+6.2%
NVDX7.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies+13.0%NVDX returned+5.2%NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies+13.0%NVDX returned+5.2%

Performance, window by window

NVDL and NVDX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
NVDLNVDXNVDLNVDXNVDLNVDX
1 month−7.1%−7.3%−5.0%−5.0%−2.2 pts−2.4 pts
3 months+6.2%+5.2%+13.0%+13.0%−6.8 pts−7.8 pts
6 months+29.0%+26.1%+42.8%+42.8%−13.7 pts−16.6 pts
1 year+18.8%+12.7%+47.0%+47.0%−28.2 pts−34.3 pts
3 years+656.7%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningfulnot published
Since launch+2489.0%+802.1%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NVDL and NVDX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDX
T-REX 2X LONG NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
IssuerGraniteSharesT-REX
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnNVDANVDA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+6.2%+5.2%
Underlying returned, 3 months+6.5%+6.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+13.0%+13.0%
Difference from stated, 3 months−6.8 pts−7.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+18.8%+12.7%
Difference from stated, over that window−28.2 pts−34.3 pts
Underlying volatility40%40%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.2 pts−2.4 pts
Expense ratio1.05%1.05%
LaunchedDec 13, 2022Oct 19, 2023

NVDL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NVDL returned +6.2% where its own daily promise gave +9.1%, 2.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times NVDA's 6.5% implies +13.0%, which makes NVDL look 6.8 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVDL aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 40% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NVDX returned +5.2% where its own daily promise gave +9.1%, 3.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times NVDA's 6.5% implies +13.0%, which makes NVDX look 7.8 points short. NVDX aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVDL or NVDX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, NVDL finished 6.8 points from what its multiple implies and NVDX finished 7.8 points from its own, so NVDL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVDL and NVDX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVDL at +2 times and NVDX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVDL or NVDX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVDL’s moved at 40% annualized and NVDX’s at 40%, so NVDL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVDL or NVDX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NVDL or NVDX?
NVDL charges 1.05% a year and NVDX charges 1.05%, so NVDL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NVDL against NVDX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NVDL against NVDX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/NVDL-NVDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources